07-18-24 A Letter From Our Servant Leaders

07-18-24 A Letter From Our Servant Leaders

07-18-24 A Letter From Our Servant Leaders 1200 1200 SVDP USA

Recently, at the Midwest Regional Meeting, I had the great pleasure of meeting and listening to The Most Reverend William Joensen, Ph.D, the Bishop of Des Moines, Iowa. In his after-dinner remarks, Bishop Joensen spoke about Frédéric Ozanam and the idea of “charitable disruption.” It was a fascinating talk (as you would expect from a former University Philosophy Professor)!

I think, in these challenging times, it’s proper and important to reflect on charitable disruption and what it means in relation to our mission as Vincentians and charitable volunteers driven by a commitment to Catholic Social Teaching.

But I want to go a step further and talk today about two powerful concepts that have shaped the very essence of charitable work: Charitable Disruption and Good Trouble. These are not mere terms, but foundational principles that guide us in serving those in need.

Charitable Disruption, as espoused by Blessed Frédéric, is a call to action. It is not enough to provide for the immediate needs of the poor; we must also address the systemic issues that perpetuate poverty. Ozanam recognized that charity must go beyond the act of giving. He said, “Charity is the Samaritan who pours oil on the wounds of the traveler who has been attacked. But it is justice’s role to prevent the attacks.”

This profound statement encapsulates the dual nature of our mission: to heal and to protect.

In the same vein, Good Trouble, a term coined by the late Rep. John Lewis, a stalwart of the civil rights movement, encourages us to question and challenge the status quo when it perpetuates injustice. Lewis believed that getting into Good Trouble was necessary for the advancement of society as a whole. It is a reminder that sometimes, to do what is right, we must be willing to disrupt the peace. Lewis used Good Trouble to describe the necessary and righteous actions taken to confront injustice.

Lewis believed that sometimes, in order to create a more just and equitable society, we must be willing to disrupt the status quo and challenge unjust systems. Good Trouble is about standing up for what is right, even when it is difficult or unpopular.

Both concepts are intertwined in their call for proactive engagement in the fight against injustice. They urge us not to be passive bystanders — but active participants in the quest for a more equitable world. As Vincentians we embody these principles through our efforts. We provide not only material assistance but also companionship, hope, and love.

Charitable Disruption and Good Trouble are not easy paths to tread. They require courage, conviction, and a deep sense of faith. They ask us to look beyond our comfort zones and to take risks for the greater good. But remember, as Vincentians, we are the hands and feet of Christ. We are the modern-day Samaritans, pouring oil on the wounds of society and standing up to prevent further harm.

Blessed Frédéric founded the Society with a vision of transforming society through acts of charity. Ozanam believed that charity was not merely about giving alms, but about addressing the root causes of poverty and injustice. He saw charity as a form of disruption — a way to challenge the status quo and bring about systemic change.

Ozanam’s concept of charitable disruption calls us to go beyond the surface level of charity. It urges us to engage with the marginalized, to understand their struggles, and to advocate for their rights. This form of charity is not passive; it is active and transformative. It disrupts the complacency of society and calls for a deeper commitment to justice and solidarity.

Lewis’s message of Good Trouble aligns closely with Ozanam’s vision of charitable disruption. Both call us to be courageous in our pursuit of justice and to recognize that true charity involves challenging the structures that perpetuate inequality and suffering. Good Trouble is not about causing chaos for its own sake; it is about creating constructive change that uplifts and empowers the oppressed.

At their core, both charitable disruption and good trouble are about love in action. They remind us that charity is not just about alleviating immediate needs but about addressing the systemic issues that create those needs. They call us to be proactive, to seek out opportunities to make a difference, and to be willing to take risks for the sake of justice.

As Catholics, we are called to embody these principles in our work. We are called to be disruptors of injustice and creators of Good Trouble. This means not only providing direct assistance to those in need — but also advocating for policies and practices that promote social justice. It means listening to the voices of the marginalized and standing in solidarity with them.

Why are these concepts so integral to our work? Because true charity is about more than just meeting immediate needs; it is about transforming lives and communities. When we engage in Charitable Disruption and Good Trouble, we are working to create a world where everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

Charitable Disruption and Good Trouble remind us that our faith calls us to action. They challenge us to move beyond our comfort zones and to be bold in our pursuit of justice. They remind us that charity is not just about what we give but about how we live our lives in service to others.

So, what can we do to put both these concepts into practice?

  1. Educate Ourselves. To effectively engage in charitable disruption and Good Trouble, we must first educate ourselves about the issues facing our communities. This means listening to the experiences of those who are marginalized and learning about the systemic factors that contribute to their struggles.
  2. Advocate for Change. Charity is not just about direct service; it is also about advocacy. We must use our voices to speak out against injustice and to advocate for policies that promote equity and inclusion.
  3. Build Relationships. True charity is rooted in relationships. We must take the time to build genuine connections with those we serve, recognizing their dignity and worth.
  4. Be Courageous. Engaging in Charitable Disruption and Good Trouble requires courage. We must be willing to take risks and to stand up for what is right, even when it is difficult.
  5. Reflect and Pray. Our work must be grounded in prayer and reflection. We must seek God’s guidance and strength as we strive to live out our call to charity and justice.

Let us be inspired by the lives of Ozanam and Lewis. Let us be disruptors of charity in the sense that we challenge ourselves and others to go beyond mere giving. Let us get into Good Trouble by advocating for policies and practices that uplift the marginalized. And let us do so with the love and compassion that is the hallmark of our faith.

In closing, I encourage each of you to continue your noble work with renewed vigor. May you find strength in the knowledge that your actions are a testament to the power of faith in action. May you always carry with you the spirit of Charitable Disruption and Good Trouble, knowing that through them, you are truly serving Christ.

Thank you for your dedication, your compassion, and your willingness to serve.

Peace and God’s blessings,
John

 

9 Comments
  • Jeffrey Colledge July 18, 2024 at 6:48 pm

    Great reflexión.

  • Excellent article, John! I agree wholeheartedly. That is the work of Systemic Change.

  • Diana Tice 7///19/24

    Outstanding and stirring. We should all be addressing to what extent we are engaging in Charitable Disruption and Good Trouble in our conferences. Thank you, John.

  • Margaret Quigley July 19, 2024 at 11:13 am

    Both charitable disruption and good trouble are as you said a means to systemic change. Empowering those we serve can be advantageous to them and to us……If presented with love, compassion and the Holy Spirit in “ our pocket” we can initiate true service.

    • Very insightful that the Holy Spirit needs to be in our pocket on every single home visit. If we’re not bringing the Holy Spirit, then we’re just the Amazon driver and everything’s free.

  • Thank you for another inspiring article. In February 2024 I attended a town meeting in the city our conference serves. The facilitators remarked that they were happy to see that 14 people attended their meeting, and that many of their town meetings had an extremely low number of attendees. How low was the number? Here’s a hint – it was a very low number.*

    On every home visit we give out information to our city’s website. Anyone can sign up and receive a couple emails a week from the city that feature things like financial help, free family events, and dates of town meetings they can attend or watch on Zoom. We tell them they are CITIZENS, a word that seems to have disappeared. Many have solved part of their temporary problems themselves, and we encourage them, saying that they’ve proven their actions bring results and that their ideas and voice can also make a difference in the city they live in. But they have to be involved in THEIR city, attend the meetings, and speak up.

    A few have said that they couldn’t present their ideas to complete strangers. I tell them they had no trouble presenting them to me!

    Blessed Frederic is an example of one man changing the word. It’s a daunting task to look at what he did and think we could do it too. But I tell my conference that we’re not trying to change the world. We’re only trying to change the 12-block area that our conference serves. It’s going to take years and years, but with the right amount of prayer and work it’s certainly doable.

    *The “very low number” was zero.

  • Madeleine Licavoli July 19, 2024 at 8:29 pm

    Are Bishop Joensen’s remarks available in written or audio form?
    Reference: Recently, at the Midwest Regional Meeting, I had the great pleasure of meeting and listening to The Most Reverend William Joensen, Ph.D, the Bishop of Des Moines, Iowa. In his after-dinner remarks, Bishop Joensen spoke about Frédéric Ozanam and the idea of “charitable disruption.” It was a fascinating talk (as you would expect from a former University Philosophy Professor)!

  • Mr. Berry,

    Disrupt the peace? How so? What do you mean by saying that? John Lewis believed protesting was crucial to American society. Although it can be done nonviolently, we’ve all seen the violence it incites. Please give examples of “good trouble” you think are fitting for Vincentians.

    When it comes to giving, there is no “surface level” and giving is never “mere.” Giving is a sacrifice of time and dollars. If meeting a need in a practical manner is considered “surface level” charity, then the Good Samaritan didn’t do enough; yet, Jesus told us to emulate him.

    My conference and council members are enough and we do enough. (Not saying there isn’t any room to grow or improve.) Who attests to this? Our neighbors in need do. They need, for example, their rent paid to keep a roof over their head. We pay it. They’re very grateful. Do we show them compassion and listen to their struggles, even pray for and with them? Of course; but if we only did the latter, it would be insincere – all talk and no do – as our neighbors would literally be left out in the cold. We need to actually “give him our cloak,” thereby Proving that our compassion and faith are genuine. The “giving of our cloak” should not be minimized. It is the thing that sows spiritual seeds.

    I make this obvious point in response to the apparent minimizing of practical help given (from e-gazette comments too) and the apparent assumption that it is often given in a solely transactional way without any spiritual component. (Nevertheless, it is good to have a reminder to not fall into that trap.)

    Giving practical help is proof of our faith. (James 2:18.) Meeting people’s financial needs is not secondary or secular or unspiritual as stated in some e-gazette comments. The writing of a check, the phone calls made, the entire process it takes to pay a neighbor’s bill, plants spiritual seeds. Jesus fed people lunch And fed them spiritually. If He had let them starve would they have listened to him?

    Moving on…you mentioned equity and inclusion. These are politically charged buzz words nowadays. What do you mean by them?
    Equal opportunity for all for sure; on the other hand, equal outcomes are not a realistic expectation.
    I close with a quote from President Ronald Reagan: “The American dream is not that every man must be level with every other man. The American dream is that every man must be free to become whatever God intends he should become.”

  • Hi John, it’s Frank from Blairsville, GA, a past SVdP president who learned it’s best to fallow GOD’s word than man’s. Being taught this while a member of SVdP I now go the way to feed the needy with a much protected independent program.

Skip to content